Critical Erros in Corrosion Literature
corrosion consultancy,corrosion courses,corrosion expert witness

Consulting Training Expert Witness Failure Analysis Design Review Corrosion Test Inspection Coatings Materials CP >>>


Errors in Corrosion Literature

Listed below are some "corrosive" errors in the literature that may either confuse or mislead readers. If you come across something that you can not figure it out, it is entirely possible that there is something wrong with that publication. Please report the errors here so that other readers can be alerted.

Index
 

  Books   Journals
  "Cathodic Protection", by John Morgan, 2nd edition, 1987  
"TBT-Free anti-fouling coatings in 2003 for better or for worse?", Corrosion Management, Nov/Dec 2002
  "Corrosion Prevention by Organic Coatings",
by C. G. Munger & L. D. Vincent, 2nd edition, 1999
   
 
"Corrosion of Steel in Concrete - Understanding, Investigation and Repair", by John P Broomfield,  2nd edition, 2007
   
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       

 


 Home | Index | Contact Us

Copyright © 1995-2024. All rights reserved.

 

Source: "Cathodic Protection", by John Morgan, 2nd edition, 1987

Quote: "3.4.6 Groundbed to Structure Distance.............Suppose a long pipeline is protected and at the mid-point between groundbeds the anode to pipe distance is 5 miles while the pipe approaches within 50 yds of the groundbed at its nearest point. The nearness, or rather the remoteness, of the groundbed may be estimated by considering the voltage drop that would occur in the vicinity of the cathode were this structure not present and the groundbed output was flowing to an infinite cathode. At a point 50 yards from such a 20 amp groundbed in 2,000 ohm cm soil the potential of the ground to infinity would be

so that a pipeline that was laid to run within 50 yards of that groundbed could expect a considerable cathodic swing caused by the positive swing of the earth near the groundbed. If the pipe to groundbed distance had been 200 yds then the positive swing of the ground relative to an infinite cathode would be

Errors: In both equations above, the unit for resistivity "p" is "Ohm.cm"; current "i", amp; distance "d", "yards". These values are directly plugged into the two equations without unit conversion.

Corrections: The unit for distance "d" must be converted into "cm" before it is plugged into the equations. The correct calculations are shown below:

For 50 yards, V=(2000 Ohm.cm x 20 Amp)/(2x3.14x4572cm)=1.39 V

For 200 yards, V=(2000 Ohm.cm x 20 Amp)/(2x3.14x18288)=0.35 V

Return to Index


Source: "Corrosion Prevention by Protective Coatings", 2nd edition, p322

Quote: "Calcareous Deposits  Some coatings seem to be permeable to electrons. In this case, the electrons pass through the organic coating and are neutralized on the surface of the coating. When this occurs, the calcareous deposit can buildup on the exterior of the coating."

Errors: Electrons can only survive in vacuum, or in metallic or electronic conductors. Electrons can NOT pass through a non-conductive organic coating. The formation of calcareous deposit is a chemical reaction that does not involve the electron-transfer at all. 

Corrections: Discard any of the repeated mention throughout the book that electrons can pass through the non-conductive organic coatings. 

Return to Index


Source: "Corrosion of Steel in Concrete - Understanding, Investigation and Repair", by John P Broomfield,  2nd edition, 2007, p236

Quote: "9.5 The Clear/Stratfull empirical calculation    Stratfull developed an empirical equation to determine the time to first distress of reinforced concrete  in sea water with a know, constant chloride content. Clear modified this to be used for atmospherically exposed structures.

Errors: The respective units for "t" and "Z" in Equation (9.4) are not defined and the equation is wrong.

Corrections: The correct equation should be:

where the units for d, t and Z are inches, years and %wt.

Return to Index


 

Source: "TBT-Free anti-fouling coatings in 2003 for better or for worse?", Corrosion Management, Nov/Dec 2002, p22

Quote: "Figure 2 shows the leaching rate graph for a typical TBT-free SPC system compared to that of a rosin-based CDP system. The initial leaching rate of the SPC is much lower than that of the CDP system......"

Errors: Figure 2 actually shows otherwise.

Corrections: The legend for SPC and CDP in Fig.2 should be swapped.

Return to Index


Home | Back to Top | Contact Us

Copyright © 1995-2024. All rights reserved.